Hi All How about we just try this for a year and then take stock?
Best Serge On 16/01/2020 18:07, Andreas Worbs wrote: > I'm completely with you. > > For our US-AS i verify my contact once a year: open the mail, click the > link, verify my data and that's it. You don't even need 5 minutes for it. > > If you have an automation fpr your abuse mails? Ok, you have to adjust > your configuration a little bit but you have to do this only once. Is it > really a problem? > > RIPE NCC will not deregister your ressources right now just because you > missed the verification. > > I would be happy if we have a mandatory abuse-c which is validated by > the RIPE. > > Rather go forward step-by-step than stop here for years. Stagnation > means regression. > > Have a good night, > > Andi > > Am 16.01.20 um 09:41 schrieb Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg: >> Hi All >> >> I think we already spent way more executive time on this thread than it >> would cost us to verify e-mail addresses. >> >> I agree e-mail does not solve all the problems. It's hard to >> automatically process, ..... >> >> But it is simple to use, and from my work as an incident handler it did >> do me good in the past. I participate in fora that validate >> abuse/emergency addresses. WHen I ask these people what their issues in >> daily life are it's never we have to validate or contact e-mail. >> >> >> And honestly: taking a step back and reading this entire thread, I'm not >> surprised that the bad guys are winning. You know: They don't care about >> the purty and beauty of a solution. They just do it and profit, and >> probably have a fabulous time seeing us argue and go at each others >> throats. >> >> I think we could do better. >> >> Best >> Serge > -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) Phone +41 76 542 44 93 | serge.d...@first.org | https://www.first.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
