Terence Parr schrieb: > On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Sam Harwell wrote: > >> //depot/code/antlrcs works for me as well. I would even prefer the >> isolation in a way, but made the other suggestion earlier based on >> patterns I saw in the existing folder structure. > > Yeah, the isolation is probably a good idea given that it doesn't use > Java antlr tool etc... > >> Prof. Parr, did you get a chance to think about this? I believe I >> have my port up-to-date with the tree filter parser work for both >> the Java and CSharp3 runtimes. > > Wow! you're fast! Do you have a day job? Or, are you neglecting your > school projects to work on ANTLR? ;)
I believe he has a day job. I've looked on the pixelminegames.com website myself and do wonder on which game he is working on. :) Back to ANTLR: Sam, would you say that it is easier to use your work to replace the current CSharp runtime files than to port Ter's Java files? Generics can be easily undone and I'm sure that I can replace LINQ queries, too. Johannes > > We should figure out how to integrate your work into the mainline > though. Have you discussed with Johannes about integrating your > runtimes etc...? Is he doing version 1 and two and you are doing C# 3? > If so, maybe that should go into the main antlr area, right? > > The C# version of the tool itself should definitely go in a different > area...well, what about //depot/code/antlr/main/toolcs similar to // > depot/code/antlr/main/tool for the Java version? > > We should be careful that we don't splinter the ANTLR metalanguage > with two different implementations. Can you remind me of your > motivation behind putting the tool itself in C#? It integrated better > with VisualStudio or something, right? > > Ter > _______________________________________________ > antlr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev > _______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev
