I am totally in favour of making the FAQ easier to use -- but on multiple levels. Ease of use needs to be attained for:
1. Finding the right Q/A. 2. Treating as a monolithic document (for printing, or mailing, or including in a tarball). 3. Referencing the right Q/A (when linking or mailing a link). 4. Updating. I regard that as probably the correct order of importance, too: users first. #2 is easily handled by SSI, as is currently done. I am still confused by your remarks about 'the state the 1.3 FAQ is in;' I may have missed some messages, but I find that obscure. What aspect of the State of the FAQ is bad? Whatever. Maybe the thing to do is to use XML with a transformation engine. Find some way to improve ease-of-use along those four axes (or at least not DISimprove it on any of them ;-), and I think I am +1. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar <http://Golux.Com/coar/> Apache Software Foundation <http://www.apache.org/> "Apache Server for Dummies" <http://Apache-Server.Com/> "Apache Server Unleashed" <http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/> ApacheCon 2001! Four tracks with over 70+ sessions. Free admission to exhibits and special events - keynote presentations by John 'maddog' Hall and David Brin. Special thanks to our Platinum Sponsors IBM and Covalent, Gold Sponsor Thawte, and Silver Sponsor Compaq. Attend only Apache event designed and fully supported by the members of the ASF. See more information and register at <http://ApacheCon.Com/>!
