Have you considered appointing several people from the community as official committers?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Catel Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > You are right Andrew. Since a few month we have slowed down the development > of the project caused by some issue with our company (indeed, building a > company based on an open source software is not that easy and involve a lot > a money issue) and we are not involved on the community anymore. > > Moreover, there is no "legal" place to post patch/issue and so forth. > > For what is worth, I can tell you that I'll start to work again on the > project in a couple of weeks, to *finally* release the 1.01 and try to look > at what has been provided by the community. > > Btw, I started to work (from scratch) to the 2.0. > > Anthony > > > Le 30/09/2010 17:16, Andrew Thompson a écrit : > > Hi, >> >> I've been working on enhancing APE to meet the needs of my specific >> application, and its working pretty well. I've actually >> reverse-engineered how to write a C module (the spidermonkey stuff was >> too slow for my liking), written my own JS library for working with APE >> without the requirement for wildcard DNS (plus, its less than 300 lines >> of code) and now I've recently added ZeroMQ support to APE. >> >> The problem is, from what I can tell, the APE project never seems to >> import changes from anyone but the weelya team. There's over a dozen >> forks with commits on Github, but from what I can tell, *none* of those >> forks has ever been merged with mainline (some even seem to be fixing >> the same bugs twice because the older fix was never pulled in mainline). >> >> Also, there's patches floating around the mailinglist in a similar >> state, I needed syslog support in APE (because the built in logger >> doesn't support ANY form of log rotation) and I found that APE doesn't >> actually support syslog (the config file is straight out misleading). >> Luckily there was a pretty good patch in the mailing list archives but, >> surprise, surprise, it never got merged or even commented on by anyone >> in a position to merge it. >> >> Basically my question is, what is the point of having APE open source at >> all if you aren't engaged with people trying to improve and enhance your >> stuff? At least give me some hope that my patches will get *looked* at. >> >> Andrew >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "APE Project" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<ape-project%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en > --- > APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) > Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/ > Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APE Project" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en --- APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/ Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
