It's something I have to work on ;) I mean, I need to work on a
process for that.
Le 01/10/2010 00:26, Felix Filozov a écrit :
Have you considered appointing several people from the community as
official committers?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Catel Anthony <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
You are right Andrew. Since a few month we have slowed down the
development of the project caused by some issue with our company
(indeed, building a company based on an open source software is
not that easy and involve a lot a money issue) and we are not
involved on the community anymore.
Moreover, there is no "legal" place to post patch/issue and so forth.
For what is worth, I can tell you that I'll start to work again on
the project in a couple of weeks, to *finally* release the 1.01
and try to look at what has been provided by the community.
Btw, I started to work (from scratch) to the 2.0.
Anthony
Le 30/09/2010 17:16, Andrew Thompson a écrit :
Hi,
I've been working on enhancing APE to meet the needs of my
specific
application, and its working pretty well. I've actually
reverse-engineered how to write a C module (the spidermonkey
stuff was
too slow for my liking), written my own JS library for working
with APE
without the requirement for wildcard DNS (plus, its less than
300 lines
of code) and now I've recently added ZeroMQ support to APE.
The problem is, from what I can tell, the APE project never
seems to
import changes from anyone but the weelya team. There's over a
dozen
forks with commits on Github, but from what I can tell, *none*
of those
forks has ever been merged with mainline (some even seem to be
fixing
the same bugs twice because the older fix was never pulled in
mainline).
Also, there's patches floating around the mailinglist in a similar
state, I needed syslog support in APE (because the built in logger
doesn't support ANY form of log rotation) and I found that APE
doesn't
actually support syslog (the config file is straight out
misleading).
Luckily there was a pretty good patch in the mailing list
archives but,
surprise, surprise, it never got merged or even commented on
by anyone
in a position to merge it.
Basically my question is, what is the point of having APE open
source at
all if you aren't engaged with people trying to improve and
enhance your
stuff? At least give me some hope that my patches will get
*looked* at.
Andrew
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:ape-project%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
