On 27 September 2010 20:55, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 September 2010 19:46, Mikel L. Forcada <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think there should be a forbid rule for imperative verbs. Imperative verbs >> (such as "sed") do not appear next to other finite forms of verbs. They may >> appear away, when there is a subordinate clause, as in > > $ echo La falta de agua provoca sed |apertium -d . es-ca > La falta d'aigua provoca set
As a point of interest, it doesn't work the other way round, because the tagger selects <num>. I don't imagine there's any clear fix for that. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
