On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:35 +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote: > On 31 March 2011 04:23, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 31 March 2011 01:35, Roman Zegarski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, could I concentrate work on using DBPedia only? I think lots of > >> information can be recived and after improvements of extraction > >> framework, using for example OmegaWiki wouldn't bring much more > >> posibilities. > > > > Are you sure? :) "440032 expressions for 46042 concepts in 282 languages". > > Actually, forget about OmegaWiki - it doesn't use the Mediawiki format > for its data.
well, if the knowledge from OmegaWiki is better/more promising for dictionary induction (which I don't know), it might be interesting to port it to DBPedia and from it to Apertium... a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
