On 31 March 2011 14:34, Antonio Toral <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:35 +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote: >> On 31 March 2011 04:23, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 31 March 2011 01:35, Roman Zegarski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Also, could I concentrate work on using DBPedia only? I think lots of >> >> information can be recived and after improvements of extraction >> >> framework, using for example OmegaWiki wouldn't bring much more >> >> posibilities. >> > >> > Are you sure? :) "440032 expressions for 46042 concepts in 282 languages". >> >> Actually, forget about OmegaWiki - it doesn't use the Mediawiki format >> for its data. > > well, if the knowledge from OmegaWiki is better/more promising for > dictionary induction (which I don't know), it might be interesting to > port it to DBPedia and from it to Apertium...
No, it's just a straightforward database. No need for parsing. Dixtools already has support for at least some of it, though there may have been bitrot (I don't think it was ever used). -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
