Sorry for long time without response. I had some really exhausting days, and I couldn't find time, to get my thoughts together. But from now on, my response time will be much more acceptable. :)
I see it was some discussion going on about DBPedia and OmegaWiki. I think I was a bit overexcited about data from DBPedia when I wrote that OmegaWiki wouldn't bring much information. I think that it would be a great thing to retrieve more content from Wiktionary with use of DBPedia, so it could be a usefull for Apertium and as well be part of Linked Data, but also I spent some time to know more about OmegaWiki. It looks very suitable for generation of dictionaries to Apertium. Morphological features of words are easily accessible in language neutral way and it uses large variety of languages. Also I took a look into apertium-dixtools code responsible for extraction of data from OmegaWiki. Haven't yet tested it, but if OmegaWiki doesn't changed data format to much in the past time it still should be usefull without making changes. So I thought that I could use this dixtools to retrive data from OmegaWiki (it should be possible almost instantaneously) then I could work on improving DBPedia extraction framework to retrieve more data from Wiktionary in language neutral way. Later I could compare dictionaries created in both methods, find if some of data are complementary and, if so, integrate them to create more sophisticated dictionary. What do You think about this approach? Best Regards, Roman Zegarski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
