On 20 February 2012 15:26, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> El dl 20 de 02 de 2012 a les 15:28 +0000, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va
>> It might reduce the number of situations where the undefined behaviour
>> arises, but it won't fix it - it will still be undefined where
>> agreement is required, and the candidates differ in gender or number,
>> for example.
>
> Well, it should fix it because it won't be undefined where the agreement
> is required. You will always (effectively) get:
>
> ^direbech<adj><mf><sp>/sans reproche<adj><mf><sp>$
>
> Parts from the second LU won't get put on the first LU. Although maybe
> if the number of tags is different, but I don't think so.

Eh? Do you mean 'transfer should check if more than one translation
has been returned, and if so, choose one'? Probably, but I wouldn't
eliminate the current behaviour entirely, because it is useful for
finding testvoc errors.

-- 
<Sefam> Are any of the mentors around?
<jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to