2012/5/17 Bernard Chardonneau <[email protected]>
> Before trying to add words into fr-es pair, I watched the dictionaries,
> but the way they are indented is surprising.
>
> If <sdefs> section is always well indented in each pair, for paradigms
> several <pardef n= ... sections are indented like in the wiki, but
> on other places in apertium-fr-es.fr.metadix , there are <e> expressions
> starting on first column and blank lines in the pardef descistion but
> no blank line between two pardef.
>
> For <e lm= parts, some of them are one per line in
> apertium-fr-es.fr.metadix but followed by a blank lines in a part of
> apertium-fr-es.es.dix and by two blank lines later.
>
> Several <e lm= start on firts column, other after serveral spaces, but
> sometimes, there are also tabs.
>
> So, are there reasons for these dictionaries to be (and to stay)
> indented like that ?
>
> If not, why not normalising it before adding words inside ?
> Are there still rules to do that ?
>
> On the contrary I saw dix files of eo-fr pair have a very regular
> presentation meaning these files had been updated by hand very
> carefully or been formatted by a tool.
>
> In the second case, what tool ?
>
>
apertium-dix-tools: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium-dixtools
Dans les fichiers dix de apertium-eo-fr il y a écrit au début comment le
dictionnaire a été formaté (j'oublie toujours et c'est pourquoi je l'écris).
Hèctor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
