On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0000, Francis Tyers wrote: > El dt 09 de 10 de 2012 a les 15:14 +0200, en/na [email protected] va > escriure: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:41:41AM +0200, Per Tunedal wrote: > > As a first pass, I would try adding semantic information in a new > module. It is the easiest way to not step on anyone's toes. If you make > something that works, and we have a language pair that can make use of > it, then we can see how to integrate it.
Hmm, I am not sure how to read this. Did you mean "Fran" when you wrote "I will try", or a more impersonal person (could be myself...) First I read it as "Fran" and I was very happy, but with more careful and pessimistic eyes it could be read as the latter. Anyway, I agree with you that a module would be the way forward. And I would happily contribute and experiment and write code and data once I know what to do. I would very much appreciate some intitial help. > > > Maybe there are similar algos around for related applications, like > > > spell checking, statistical translation (tree model or even factored > > > translation, look at Moses), speech recognition or even artificial > > > intelligence? And you mentioned finding the shortest way. Someone might > > > have an idea of where to look for algos? There might be some open source > > > code to copy or be inspired by. > > http://ixa2.si.ehu.es/ukb/ Thanks. Well, it is not just homonyms, I see. And the article does report significant improvements. > > > BTW Just like you I'm into this just for the fun of it. I will only work > > > with things that are of great interests to me. Primarily, I like to > > > solve problems. Or help others to solve theirs. > > > > Yes, agree. I think that also discussing on the list without doing > > commits is contributing to the Apertium project. > > And I would like to contribute more (I have done some committs already) > > but I am stuck with committs because I am not getting > > the advice from more seasoned people, that I am in my limited understanding > > thinking that I need guidance on, to not hurt the overall system > > or the specific language pair I am working on, or to not violate Apertium > > design principles. > > Here is what I think: > > * For Swedish-Danish this will be unnecessary. Why? I think there is enough difference between the two languages to try it out. best regards Keld ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
