I have updated all the pairs I could in
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/apertium/svn/builds with these omissions:
apertium-ca-it no longer installs mode ca-it - bug, or should ca-it be
removed from language-pairs?
apertium-eo-es mode es-eo now uses CG-3.
apertium-fr-ca has since been renamed to fra-cat, but now uses CG-3.
apertium-fr-es throws an exception when executing:
http://codepad.org/1eAyqhEL
apertium-ht-en no longer exists.
apertium-oc-ca throws exceptions when jar'ing: http://codepad.org/NZne49C1
apertium-oc-es ditto: http://codepad.org/Ju9D58UO
apertium-sv-da has since been renamed to swe-dan, but there is no release
with that name yet.
And, I had to bump the used revision for en-es, eo-en, eo-fr, es-ca because
their releases were so old they no were no longer buildable.
I made a script to do the updating for me
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/apertium/svn/builds/update-pairs.php which pulls
revisions from the packaging system, because that is currently the best
source of release information.
I would like to add a 5th field to language-pairs which is a comma
separated list of extra dependencies needed for the pair, instead of simply
skipping them. E.g., "cg, hfst" for kaz-tat. Then systems that can't
install such dependencies can skip those pairs.
-- Tino Didriksen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
