Per Tunedal <[email protected]> čálii:

> Hi,
> is it possible to do a "back-port" of swe-dan to sv-da? The
> back-ported version would benefit from the improved swedish monodix.
> Unfortunately, the most blatant problem, the untrained tagger, would
> persist, though.

Do you mean in order to avoid the CG requirement? In that case, you can
just remove it from the pipeline, no further change needed. 


-Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to