Hi Mikel, Would you include it in the Java-versions, if I make a back-port of swe-dan to sv-da? Is it a requirement that the new version would be "released"? What would qualify the new version of sv-da as a "release"? Yours, Per Tunedal
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016, at 12:39, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > Per Tunedal <[email protected]> čálii: > > > Hi, > > is it possible to do a "back-port" of swe-dan to sv-da? The > > back-ported version would benefit from the improved swedish monodix. > > Unfortunately, the most blatant problem, the untrained tagger, would > > persist, though. > > Do you mean in order to avoid the CG requirement? In that case, you can > just remove it from the pipeline, no further change needed. > > > -Kevin > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
