Hello! I'm working on apertium-eng-cat and I've been having some issues
with genitives. Currently, many noun paradigms in apertium-eng (mostly
irregular nouns) have a <gen> form with the genitive. Not all nouns have
it, so apertium-eng also includes a specific lemma for the regular genitive
('s) to add the <gen> tag in the analysis.
However, when using apertium-eng for generation, it is impossible to know
in advance whether or not a lemma has the genitive form, so generation for
lemmas without the <gen> form is broken.
I'm considering adding a <gen> form to all the affected paradigms to fix
this issue. Any objections?
Marc Riera
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff