> > And here is my comment. > > 1. Regarding current overlay in page 3, don't we need to mention about ASO > AC/NRO NC > which is responsible to global policy for IP/AS as part of ICANN? > (Current figure seems ICANN is handling it by themselves directly, but > it is not true) >
Good point. > 2. While I prefer last option in page 9, do we need "NEW ENTITY 1" > responsible for gTLD policy? > I agree that it is ideally better to separate gTLD policy and gTLD > contracts, > but I don't think it is doable in this timeframe. > It seems more doable in the timeframe than the previous option of having the NE1 take on a similar policy role for IP/ASNs and ccTLDs as well. Whats your opinion on those two options? Which would be a better model if there was sufficient time to implement either? Regards, Dean _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
