Dean, While I'm very appreciated for your and InternetNZ's effort, can you speak it up to all community members, not only to me? (or to EC and/or DG in specific case)
As Skeeve pointed out, I'm just a delegate from one of APNIC members in here. (BTW, I suggest you no dancing here also:-) ) Rgs, Masato Yamanishi On 14/03/24 20:35, "Dean Pemberton" <[email protected]> wrote: >Yamanishi-san, > >I think one of the most important things here is to get the important >information out to the community, encourage people to become >knowledgable about the issues, and contribute to them where they feel >appropriate. > >To that end InternetNZ group staff have prepared a short paper to help >inform people about the debate regarding the transition of the United >States Government's DNS responsibilities to the global >multistakeholder community. > >The paper explores the nature of what exactly is being transitioned, >and then analyses the actual DNS functions at the global level, >locates these in current institutional configurations, and then sets >out a few options for alternative arrangements. > >None of these are necessarily an InternetNZ preferred model. Our >purpose in publishing this paper is to help the discussion happen, and >to show there are many possible ways to organise the DNS settlement >after the USG exits from its current role. > >I am posting the information here in the hope that APNIC members find >it a useful resource with which to start providing feedback to ICANN >on this topic. > >https://internetnz.net.nz/system/files/pages/2014/2014-03-icann-iana-role- >structures.pdf > > >Regards >Dean Pemberton > >Technical Policy Advisor >InternetNZ >+64 21 920 363 (mob) >[email protected] > >To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
