Dean and All, And here is my comment.
1. Regarding current overlay in page 3, don't we need to mention about ASO AC/NRO NC which is responsible to global policy for IP/AS as part of ICANN? (Current figure seems ICANN is handling it by themselves directly, but it is not true) 2. While I prefer last option in page 9, do we need "NEW ENTITY 1" responsible for gTLD policy? I agree that it is ideally better to separate gTLD policy and gTLD contracts, but I don't think it is doable in this timeframe. Rgs, Masato Yamanishi On 14/03/25 15:05, "Masato Yamanishi" <[email protected]> wrote: >Dean, > >While I'm very appreciated for your and InternetNZ's effort, >can you speak it up to all community members, not only to me? >(or to EC and/or DG in specific case) > >As Skeeve pointed out, I'm just a delegate from one of APNIC members in >here. >(BTW, I suggest you no dancing here also:-) ) > > >Rgs, >Masato Yamanishi > > > > >On 14/03/24 20:35, "Dean Pemberton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Yamanishi-san, >> >>I think one of the most important things here is to get the important >>information out to the community, encourage people to become >>knowledgable about the issues, and contribute to them where they feel >>appropriate. >> >>To that end InternetNZ group staff have prepared a short paper to help >>inform people about the debate regarding the transition of the United >>States Government's DNS responsibilities to the global >>multistakeholder community. >> >>The paper explores the nature of what exactly is being transitioned, >>and then analyses the actual DNS functions at the global level, >>locates these in current institutional configurations, and then sets >>out a few options for alternative arrangements. >> >>None of these are necessarily an InternetNZ preferred model. Our >>purpose in publishing this paper is to help the discussion happen, and >>to show there are many possible ways to organise the DNS settlement >>after the USG exits from its current role. >> >>I am posting the information here in the hope that APNIC members find >>it a useful resource with which to start providing feedback to ICANN >>on this topic. >> >>https://internetnz.net.nz/system/files/pages/2014/2014-03-icann-iana-role >>- >>structures.pdf >> >> >>Regards >>Dean Pemberton >> >>Technical Policy Advisor >>InternetNZ >>+64 21 920 363 (mob) >>[email protected] >> >>To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. > > _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
