Andy,
*All* of Internet Governance is something like *all* of the universe :-p
, APNIC isn't involved in all, but a certain part surrounding its
business, but of course I understand you point out it might be excessive.
I personally admire InternetNZ's job - from a viewpoint of JPNIC, an
Internet promotion body in another part of the globe, and try to catch
the essence of your advise through the blog and other resources.
Akinori - btw, please feel free call me Akinori without "-san", everyone!
(2014/03/27 17:08), Andy Linton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, MAEMURA Akinori <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have understood at this stage that the community which includes
you and active people on this mailing list has a certain level of
concern on such spending, which the EC has regarded appropriate,
and the EC is now under consideration how we can serve onto such
concern.
We are working on.
Akinori-san,
Thanks for the response.
APNIC should be involved in *some* of the activities that people call
'Internet Governance'. I'm just not convinced that we should be
involved in *all* of them.
I talked at length last week with John Earls as part of the survey
work he's doing on member engagement. I'm quite content that that
information will percolate back to the EC in due course and I hope
that others do the same.
I'll point the recent post I made to this list "InternetNZ Blog post
on Internet Governance" and suggest that the sooner APNIC gets to
something like this the better.
andy
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
