Hello everyone,

Just went through the comments of Sia , Owen, JJ and Karl.

I agree to the reasoning given in Sia's mail that APNIC is not running a 
country where matters of franchise etc come up. We cannot compare Oranges with 
peaches. APNIC is a company and has to function according to the laws governing 
companies as well as rules and regulations for internal governance of companies.

We should not confuse the above with matters of governing sovereign countries. 
Each country has its own laws and methodology. These have nothing to do with 
APNIC. What concerns us are the Laws of Australia in such matters of company 
administration. I think Christopher has already cleared the position of 
Australian Laws on this issue.

I am sure EC  have done their due diligence on this issue. They have acted 
promptly on  working out the required amendments to the bye laws and brought 
them for voting. Probably no substance under the current laws has been found on 
the issue of OMOV.

I feel the current system of graded tiers according resources is a very fair 
system and does not require any change.

Thank you.
_______________________________________________
APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to