On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:18:38PM -0500, Geoff Strickler wrote:
> Numerous studies have shown lecturing to be the least effective teaching
> methodology

This is a loaded statement.  Lecturing is unidirectional that asks
nothing of the students.  Once the teacher starts interacting with
the students, even without the crutch of technology, you are doing
something else.

I would also be interested in seeing these studies.  Part of the
reason is for critical analysis, since I have real concerns about
studies confusing novelty with effectiveness.  I'm also curious
about effective teaching methods.  While I teach, I do so without
a formal background in education.

> One of the biggest advantages to the teachers is the ability to give quizes
> that the students answer privately using a controller in their desks.

I agree that this is one of the more interesting aspects of the
system.  It is, however, quite easy to implement without a $100,000
AV system.  Or have you never had a teacher ask you to pull out a
piece of paper to do a pop quiz. ;-)

As for the private nature of learning, I learned something very
quickly when I moved to the front of the classroom: you don't really
know something until you are forced to express the ideas to somebody
else.  Multiple choice tests don't force you to express ideas.
Given how student evaluations are handled today, even essays don't
force you to express ideas clearly.  (This is judging from how work
is evaluated at the university level, and the quality of work I
see from recent high school graduates.)

> It does not decrease student/teacher interaction, the multi-media stuff is
> used to supplement the teacher's presentation, not replace it.

Baloney.  The moment that school boards start equipping classrooms
with $100,000 AV systems is the moment that class sizes start to
grow.  The money has to come from somewhere, and $100,000 amounts
to a couple of teacher years.

  You would also have a tough time supporting that 10 to 20
year life span without adding considerable expenses for maintainance.

> One of the things it can offer is interaction between classes,
> even in other states or countries

You have been able to do stuff like this for years, particularly
via voice but even with video.  I somehow doubt that the added
dimension of online video streaming is going to do all that much.

> I don't think this should replace computer labs in schools

This would probably be a better investment than computer labs,
since the class is an integrated unit.  I have discussed technology
in the classroom with a few high school students and have watched
the reactionary response of university administrators.  It seems
as though there is a war, of sorts, between students who abuse the
technology and staff who restrict its use.  Curiously, this seems
to have more to do with the internet than anything else.  I certainly
don't recall these problems with the standalone systems we had in
my school days, and I was even encouraged in ways of mischief by
my teachers because exploring the internals of an Apple II caused
no harm.

> Pricing is probably negotiable and would likely decrease significantly with
> volume production.  These systems have an expected life of 15-20 years, far
> longer than the useful life of most computers and on par with the useful
> life of textbooks.

I would estimate that 15-20 years far longer than the expected
life.  The projector lamps would be impossible to replace within
a decade, and they would only have a life of 5 years according to
the wildly inflated figures from the manufacturer.  The computer
itself would have to be replaced every five to ten years, simply
to ensure that the teachers can continue to develop multimedia
content on their own machines and use it in the classroom.  Many
of the integrated AV components will be obsolete (DVD) even to the
point of being irrelevant (VHS).  If the past is any indication,
much of the wiring would have to be replaced at some point.  (VGA
was around for 15 years, and it is currently being replaced by new
standards).  And who knows what else.

Byron.

-- 
Apple2list is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

    /      Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com     \
   / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Apple2list info:        <http://lowendmac.com/lists/apple2.html>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/apple2list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to