So would it be possible to replace a crystal or oscillator on the logic board 
to clock chip it or
slow it down?  i ask because i'm making a variable speed oscillator for clock 
chipping macs.  

it'll go to less than 1 mhz and can be varied in steps of 0.1 mhz or finer, on 
up to 133 mhz.  it'll
connect to the serial port and be controllable by any dumb terminal program 
with simple commands,
and will respond with status as well.  it will default on power cycling to a 
preprogrammed frequency
saved in eeprom which can be changed once a suitable frequency is found (or if 
set too high can be
reset by plugging it's serial interface into another computer).  

i'm designing it to connect with conductive epoxy (i'm repackaging it into 
smaller syringes to make
it cost effective) and it's barely larger than the normal oscillator, pinned 
out so that it can be
mounted on top of the old one.  i'm in the middle of another project right now 
but should be back to
that project in a week or two and will hopefully have it done within a week of 
getting back to it. 
i just have to write the code for it, i've already had the circuit boards made 
(3 small surface
mount chips, i'm using both sides of the board, very dense).  

i'm wondering if this would also be useful to people playing with the apple II 
line etc.  i have a
iie myself that i'll be getting up later.

just a thought, since people are doing hardware hacks on the older apple ii 
line as well as older
macs (and i'm considering some other apple ii projects eventually).  i'm 
disabled but have some good
time and i'd love to come up with a couple of little products that make a 
little money and are
useful to people, low volume stuff since i don't have much to put into anything 
or a way to build in
large quantity.

the apple II was the second computer i ever used, right after a timesharing 
system via 300 baud
decwriter II terminals and i've always loved them!  even hand assembled some 
assembly code for one.

Antonio Rodr�guez wrote:
> 
> Just a thought. Apple licensed the Zip technology from Zip Technologies but
> built it directly into the //c+'s motherboard because Zip Technologies
> wasn't able to provide the Zip chip in the quantities required by Apple (see
> http://www.apple2history.org/history/ah09.html#ZipIIc). So it looks likely
> to me that the "slowdown" procedure should work in both the Zip and the
> //c+. Of course, I do not have a //c+ (I'd like to!), and thus can not
> assure it...
--------

-- 
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of 
private power to the
point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its 
essence is fascism �
ownership of government by an individual, by a group or any controlling private 
power.": President
Franklin D. Roosevelt <http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1106-30.htm>

-- 
Apple2list is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

    /      Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com     \
   / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Apple2list info:        <http://lowendmac.com/lists/apple2.html>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/apple2list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to