Thanks for making this update.
I don't think Roland and Polina who had made last call comments had yet
had the time to check that the changes in the last revision met what
they were expecting, so I'd like to give them (and anyone else who has
comments) a couple of weeks to check this revision out, and assuming
there are no major issues or objections by around 12/15, will plan to
end the working group last call, and send the document to the area
director for publication.
On 11/27/2015 5:50 AM, Kuhn Nicolas wrote:
Dear all,
This updated version integrates:
- modification on the buffer sizes, following some discussion points raised by
Michael Scharf on the tcpm mailing list [1];
- some nits raised by Greg Skinner.
Kind regards,
Nicolas KUHN
[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg09894.html
-----Message d'origine-----
De : aqm [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de [email protected]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 novembre 2015 11:44
À : [email protected]
Cc : [email protected]
Objet : [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet
Scheduling Working Group of the IETF.
Title : AQM Characterization Guidelines
Authors : Nicolas Kuhn
Preethi Natarajan
Naeem Khademi
David Ros
Filename : draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt
Pages : 35
Date : 2015-11-27
Abstract:
Unmanaged large buffers in today's networks have given rise to a slew
of performance issues. These performance issues can be addressed by
some form of Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanism, optionally in
combination with a packet scheduling scheme such as fair queuing.
The IETF Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling working group
was formed to standardize AQM schemes that are robust, easily
implementable, and successfully deployable in today's networks. This
document describes various criteria for performing precautionary
characterizations of AQM proposals. This document also helps in
ascertaining whether any given AQM proposal should be taken up for
standardization by the AQM WG.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
