> On 28 Mar, 2017, at 14:39, Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not convinced I understand the definitions of "work conserving" and "non > work conserving" in this context. A "work conserving" scheduling algorithm > keeps an interface transmitting as long as there is data in the queue, while > a non-work-conserving algorithm reduces the effective rate of the interface > by spacing packets out.
In which case the explanation makes even less sense, as PIE doesn’t include a shaper. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
