Hi, Am 28.03.2017 um 13:39 schrieb Fred Baker:
> I'm not convinced I understand the definitions of "work conserving" > and "non work conserving" in this context. A "work conserving" > scheduling algorithm keeps an interface transmitting as long as there > is data in the queue, while a non-work-conserving algorithm reduces > the effective rate of the interface by spacing packets out. +1 (that's also the definition I use, so I'm lost here too) Regards, Roland _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
