Re: Something I've noticed ...

[Bernie]

Ricsi wrote:
>This is also the reason why ncache2 was faster, because the testprogram
>favors caches with small read ahead buffer.
>Most accesses are random, and so a big read ahead buffer slows this
>artificial test down.

Interesting, I tested to lower (from 56K) to the default 16K read-ahead and
I got a performence decrease (not by much but it was there).

>-=> ? troffeeriuqertahtsenilgatetahuoytnod <=-

);!seY