Hi
Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is also the reason why ncache2 was faster, because the
>> testprogram favors caches with small read ahead buffer. Most accesses
>> are random, and so a big read ahead buffer slows this artificial test
>> down.
B> Interesting, I tested to lower (from 56K) to the default 16K
B> read-ahead and I got a performence decrease (not by much but it was
B> there).
I was just guessing ... :)
So I was wrong ... ncache _IS_ a good cache, but generally the
speed difference is marginal ... it is IMHO not really important what cache
you use, but it's important to use a cache at all ;-)
>> -=> ? troffeeriuqertahtsenilgatetahuoytnod <=-
B> );!seY
(;
CU, Ricsi
--
Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
-=> While there's life, there's hope -Cicero <=-
