Ricsi wrote:
>Nope ... we are not forgetting.
>
>But we are talking about LANs, and not about serial connections.

But there are headers to be accounted for here, so the speeds (if we assume
we can count <g>) are not correct as we have done so far. But to get more
exact seems useless to me.
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...

Reply via email to