[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Dear List:
> 
>       A very interesting mail from a member on memory optimization.
> <snip>

As I was not that member I'm afraid I can't answer those questions.
But, I will have some of my own :)

> Below are the list of my memory details:
>
>
>              --------------------- DOS Usage ---------------------
>              DOS reports 639 K-bytes of memory:
>                 75 K-bytes used by DOS and resident programs
>                564 K-bytes available for application programs
>

Hello Tom;
That is a quite small amount of low memory available.
What was your reason again for not loading stuff high ?

>                           *************************
>                           *   DOS Memory Blocks   *
>                            *************************
>
>           0273    1,152  HIMEM                  Device Driver
>           02BC    3,104  EMM386                 Device Driver
>           037F    2,480  SMARTDRV               Device Driver
>           041B    2,672  DOS                    Open Files Table
>           04C3      256  DOS                    File Control Blocks

That can all go high.

>           04D4   27,632  DOS                    File Buffers

That's a lot of buffer space. - If you really need it - it can go high.    

>           0B94      976  DOS                    Current Directories
>           0BD2    3,008  DOS                    Stacks

You can get more space by setting stacks to 0,0 for most applications.
    
>           0C8F       64  DOS                    DOS System Area
>           0C94    2,640  COMMAND                Program
>           0D3A       64  COMMAND                Data
>           0D3F      256  COMMAND                Environment
>           0D50      208  WIN                    Environment
>           0D5E    1,792  WIN                    Program
>           0DCF      240  win386                 Environment
>           0DDF   16,896  win386                 Program

If you use a dual boot system, you don't need to load any wincrap when in
DOS mode.
 
>                                 *****************
>                                 *   CPU Speed   *
>                                 *****************
> 
> This       |
> Computer   +************************************  357.1
>            |
> INTEL      |
> Pentium-66 +*********************  211.4
>            |
> INTEL      |
> 486DX-33   +*******  71.2
>            |
> INTEL      |
> 386DX-33   +****  35.9
>            |
>            +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
>                 50   100  150  200  250  300  350  400  450  500  550
>                                       Computing Index
> 
>                          Main Processor: 80486SX, 25 MHz

Now that HAS to be a mistake / bug
Your 25Mhz '486SX is 5 times faster than a 33Mhz '486DX ?
I don't think so. :)

> <snip>
>
> buffers=50,2

WAY to many buffers IMHO. If you have too many buffers, you not only waste
memory, you waste time as programs look thru all the buffers before looking
in the cache for items for found.

I hope some of these suggestions turn out to be useful. 
At least we can discuss them.


-  Clarence Verge
--
-  Help stamp out FATWARE.  As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--


Reply via email to