On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 some message from Samuel W. Heywood appeared before me...
>As a result of the recent Micro$oft anti-trust suit, I came to understand
>that it is a violation of the laws governing fair competitive practices
>for one to intentionally program an operating system for the express purpose
>of making it incompatible with a competitor's software. I don't know how
>they can get away with this.
Hummzz, most people don't look at this as Windows 2000 is NOT an upgrade
voor Windows 98 (which does do DOS ;)) But an upgrade for Windows NT. The
Windows 98 (cq DOS) line is slightly going to disappear with the last
windows cq dos release called Windows Millenium. Microsoft doesn't have to
provide DOS in Windows 2000 because it's an entirely other operating
system.. Like Linux vs Dos it's here Windows 2000 vs Windows 98 ... Get
the point ?
--
Cliff Albert | IRCNet: #wan99, #linux.nl, #ne2000, #cafeetje
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | UnderNet: #groningen ICQ: 18461740
