>> I meant the spellcheck it runs on the text available to the visitor: the
>> content.
>
>On that basis,
> I could see how one might clasify http://www.websitegarage.com as bing
>"worthless" if they were using it to validate the content of a page.
>
>But since we are speaking of validating the html code itself, and *not*
>the content of the page......... <g>
Ah but...
The spellcheck is a useful additional service, even for a Limey writing
British English. I would've thought Netscape/AOL (the powers behind
WebsiteGarage) would have enough clout and global sensitivity to provide
spellcheckers for all the major languages.
There are many expensively-produced sites that could be made ship-shape
through the application of a freeware spellchecker. The basics demand
as much attention as all the gloss. Or perhaps they don't :-)
<"What's 'anally retentive' got to do with anything?">
Jake
