Johan,
I used the "Doctor HTML" site, and find it well worth putting on the
"hotlist" ... the advanced testing provides excellent feedback, and
errors have line numbers attached. The way the error report is
generated makes it very readable, and easy to move into an ASCII file so
I can have the report in one window of my editor and the actual page
code in the other.
Thanks for the lead!
Everyone else -- the ability to select what precise tests you want can
shorten the reports generated. You might like this page.
l.d.
====
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:49:30 +0200, Johan Bengtsson wrote:
> Den Wed, 28 Jun 2000 skrev du:
>> I tried validator.w3.org and found it worthless.
> Try Doctor HTML:
> http://www2.imagiware.com/RxHTML/
--
Learn about B'FOR
Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records
<a href="http://www.b-for.org">B'FOR www.b-for.org</a>
[Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential if desired.]
-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
