Michael wrote:
> Yes, this was my plan..... as Netscape 6 for Linux is real crap, I think
> importance of releasing really small and fast browser for Linux is
> high.
NS 6 under Win 95 seemed ok on the family computer (P120, 48MB RAM) but I
didn't use it much since win95 is really slow when used on the InterNet. I
think this is because it assumes that since it has a LAN connection it
should wait for the gateway (or DNS) to respond before sending the next
package (I'm assuming 2400 bps is faster actually).
> But maybe I will get stuck with 16bits for some time more...
Ah, yes as I explained to you in another mail I can't help out much with a
32-bit port :(
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/
