On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:40:47 +0100, Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> EPPPD 0.7 pre-alpha
> * Smaller in memory requirments with 10K
> * Works well (for Glenn and me anyway <g>)
Yes. It works just fine for me.
> EPPPD 0.7
> * Added support for setting the FIFO trigger level
> * Somewhat smaller (probably only a few KBs)
> * Abandoned
You did a great job with v0.7pa
I hope you'll have time to continue the work again some day.
> Now I don't know exactly what LSPPP has now since I don't follow it that
> closely, I do know that it's possible for them to add support for
> everything that EPPPD 0.6 beta had since I sent this code from them (which
> I "stole" from Michael - the code could *not* be found on the InterNet, it
> has been debated a few times here on where to get it).
Many useful links are on this page, http://lxtcp.hplx.net/
(including http://lxtcp.hplx.net/ppp06src.zip ---filesize 633,502 bytes)
> All ISPs use PAP/CHAP (otherwise they are probably named AOL or CompuServe
> and they aren't ISPs) so supporting it is something that can't be bad.
> Sooner or later you are going to get the bright idea to save a few bucks
> and get an account at some other ISP and then you might need it. It is -
> and IMNSHO always has been (or atleast since 1994) - the de facto standard
> for PPP connections (SLIP was common earlier).
I checked with the owner of CisNet.com
He has the system setup for PAP authenication, CHAP authentication
and terminal login. (manually enter username and password)
No-one has ever complained about "dialer incompatibility". ;-)
--
Glenn
(your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
