Hi
04 Feb 2001, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LB> Perhaps you can suggest to your MIS people that their
LB> "authentication" isn't really that secure, and
LB> that the area which needs to protect SMTP is telnet
What do you mean by that ??
(area which needs to protect SMTP is telnet ??)
There are no different versions of SMTP.
The SMTP demon does not care wether you are human/another program, wether
you use telnet, or arachne to send to port 25.
The SMTPd (sendmail, qmail, ...) handles the socket.
Which program has opened the socket on the other side is completely
irrelevant !!!
LB> l.d.
CU, Ricsi
--
|~)o _ _o Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> {ICQ: 7659421} (PGP)
|~\|(__\| -=> 43% of all statistics are totally worthless !!! <=-
- Help! Smtp authentication? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Joerg Dietze
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Sam Ewalt
- Help! Smtp authentication? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Sam Ewalt
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? L.D. Best
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Thomas Mueller
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? (longish) Steve
- Help! Smtp authentication? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Howard Schwartz
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Sam Ewalt
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Sam Ewalt
- Help! Smtp authentication? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Help! Smtp authentication? Thomas Mueller
