Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:14:29 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Anyway, I would prefer to keep the correct extension and operate on that
> > basis instead of mimetype if possible. ;-)
>
> Ahhhh, now you've touched on the "permanant fix".
> If we disregard "content-type", "content-encoding" and file extension
> but instead look inside the file itself to see what needs to be done. :)
No, I wouldn't recommend going to THAT extreme.
What I would like to see is pretty simple.<g>
If the extension and content-type agree, go with it.
If they disagree, use the extension.
You can see that the above is satisfied if you simply go with the extension.
I'd like atleast an option to allow the file extension to have priority over
content-type/mimetype.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
