..
..
Clarence
Well said.
And keeping it simple, both reduces bandwidth, and lets
us read our e-mail with less consumption of our valuable
time.
Glad to see you are back to Arachne 1.62 You motivate
me to go back to my XTs, and my DOS 2.x etc <G>
..
..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 19:54:39 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Curtis Matthiesen wrote:
>> Thanks for your help and sorry about the HTML attachments before, I
>> assume that you guys are either using Arachne mail or another program that
>> does not support HTML.
> Well actually, we are all probably using programs that DO support HTML
> attachments - Arachne mail certainly does - and I'm using Netscape here -
> it's just that we don't like them. <G> It's a super waste of bandwidth.
> We waste enough bandwidth just blathering away about nothing - because
> that's what people like me do. :) If we let our browser generate an extra
> copy of our message, all prissied up with the HTML crap, the bandwidth goes
> up by about 3x. :(
> Thanks for helping to tidy up the internet. ;-)
> - Clarence Verge
> --
> - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
> - The internet is infected - Windows is a VIRUS !!
> --
-- Arachne V1.66, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
