>When you were flagging RTF-to-HTML converters I came across WP2HTML:
>http://www.res.bbsrc.ac.uk/wp2html/
>but haven't had cause to try it yet. It converts WordPerfect and Word.
>-- Well, I've just had a look and found it's a DOS prog that needs Win9x!
>D'oh or D'uh? Older versions converted WordPerfect only. Maybe we could
>send some persuaders to the author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I've had some, dare I say, influence in getting QuANGOs (Quasi-Autonomous
>Non-Governmental Organizations) to use RTF instead of Word DOC. There's
>an article at http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010610.html which I can use
>to back criticisms of PDFs in webspace.
>Jake
You have me curious to browse those URLs! Why do you/we want RTF on the WWW?
Is it a lesser evil compared to MS-Word .DOC? Is it less secretive?
DOS progs that need Windows are an unnecessary nuisance? Does the author think
it so much easier to go through the Windows GUI than to simply type the command
under DOS? Or does the author think a user would go into shock or suffer a
heart attack upon seeing a command prompt, and then his/her survivors would sue?
