On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 23:24:38 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glenn said.... >> My point is that they are not "exactly" the way as intended. >> (CLOSE perhaps.... but not EXACT) > In my view the key words are "as intended." A fax > isn't an EXACT copy. Even a Xerox isn't an EXACT copy. > However they are certainly close enough that they fall > within "exactly as intended." > 99.99% of the time a pdf will also be rendered > "exactly as intended," which isn't to say a pixel-for- > pixel reproduction (because then we'd be back into the > realm of graphics), but close enough that the author > will say, "Yes, that looks as I intended it to." > .... but then, I suppose we should let Bastiaan clarify > what he meant. ;-) I'll leave that up to Bastiaan. I think that I've said too much already. <g> -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
