On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 22:25:06 -0600, "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 02 16:38:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) >> wrote: >>> The only major factor against [DOS] I can think of is that it is ``old'' -- >>> development has mostly stopped except for embedded systems. But so what? > I found out I can > read better than figure out someone elses idea of a graphical symbol. > I do most my stuff in windoze2000 but much prefer DOS, to me DOS is > newer than 2000. 2000 tells me what to do, I tell DOS what to do. > If I knew programming, I could tell it a lot more. It's small, fast, > and efficient, that's all I need. Hey guys, I guess DOS isn't dead. It was just resting ! It was hard for me to believe that any new fans would ever be created but Rob is proof that it IS possible. ;-) - Clarence Verge - Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
