On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:54:37 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:19:45 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> Hey guys, I guess DOS isn't dead. It was just resting ! >> It was hard for me to believe that any new fans would ever be created >> but Rob is proof that it IS possible. ;-) > Necrophilia! > Sam Ewalt Hey folks; This may be a naive question, but I'm curious. Most of the limitations of DOS that I see, seem to be imposed upon it, such as lack of further developement. It looks to me to be a concerted effort to kill it. Is it dead due to inherent flaws in the system or because the wealthiest man in the world, with extreme power and influence over government, military, technological, and corporate entities says it's dead? Rob: -- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/ -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
