On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:15:40 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:32:15 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> Using the OLD wwwman, how can I be sure to get a persistent item that >> would NOT persist with the NEW version ? i.e. how to test "nocache" ? > Any .htm file generated with the old version of wwwman will not have > "nocache". So *will* be cached by core. My test was to do a directory listing with with the old WWWman, add the arachne nocache tag, F2 to save and view the result, delete an item, and use the forward/back function to reload the page using the modified html. I was NOT getting any caching even when I didn't have the nocache tag. i.e. The deleted item NEVER re-appeared. (V1.62) > Any that were created by the new version will have so won't be.<VBG> How about suggesting a test that is guaranteed to show persistence with the old version ? I can easily get undesired persistence with Insight and also undesired NON-persistence too. - Clarence Verge - Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
