On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 02:43:05 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:15:40 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:32:15 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: >>> Using the OLD wwwman, how can I be sure to get a persistent item that >>> would NOT persist with the NEW version ? i.e. how to test "nocache" ? >> Any .htm file generated with the old version of wwwman will not have >> "nocache". So *will* be cached by core. > My test was to do a directory listing with with the old WWWman, add the > arachne nocache tag, F2 to save and view the result, delete an item, and > use the forward/back function to reload the page using the modified html. > I was NOT getting any caching even when I didn't have the nocache tag. > i.e. The deleted item NEVER re-appeared. (V1.62) >> Any that were created by the new version will have so won't be.<VBG> > How about suggesting a test that is guaranteed to show persistence with > the old version ? I can easily get undesired persistence with Insight > and also undesired NON-persistence too. No problem. :) (using v1.68 or lower) F10 F8 Your computer Drive c: "U" (utilities) Cacheindex (3 .HTMs will be shown along with cacheindex.dgi) (using v1.70 and the new wwwman) F10 F8 Your computer Drive c: "U" Cacheindex (nothing there other than cacheindex.dgi) -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
