On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> As previously discussed >>>> (http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-December/009353.html) >>>> I've just added inetutils-1.5-1in testing to implement FS#12281. This >>>> new package will provide the following network clients/daemons: >>>> ftp/ftpd >>>> rexec/rexecd >>>> rlogin/rlogind >>>> rsh/rshd >>>> talk/talkd >>>> telnet/telnetd >>>> rcp. >>>> >>>> It will replace the following packages: >>>> core/netkit-telnet >>>> extra/netkit-ftp >>>> extra/netkit-rsh >>>> On a related note, netkit-tftp will be remove from the repo in favor >>>> of tftp-hpa. The inetutils tools can also profide a tftp >>>> client/server. It's currently not included in the inetutils package. >>>> We could provide them in a separate package if there is sufficient >>>> demand. >>>> >>>> As inetutils will go to core as it will replace a core package, it >>>> will require the usual 2 signoffs. Signoff from users will be >>>> appreciated as well as these network tools have a low usage these >>>> days. Please indicate what specific client/daemon you tested. Because >>>> it's a totally new package, I'll keep it in testing for at least a >>>> week to give more time to test. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>> >>> Wait before signing off. inetutils 1.6 is out. >>> >> >> inetutils 1.6 is in testing now. Please signoff. > > telnet on i686 was fail for me. The escape sequence didn't seem to work at > all. Sorry, I actually meant x86_64 here. This was the scene on i686:
:: Retrieving packages from testing... inetutils-1.6-1-i686 321.9K 212.4K/s 00:00:02 [---------------------] 100% checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [---------------------] 100% error: could not prepare transaction error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) inetutils: /usr/bin/ftp exists in filesystem inetutils: /usr/bin/rcp exists in filesystem inetutils: /usr/bin/rsh exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. dmc...@dublin ~ $ pacman -Qo /usr/bin/ftp /usr/bin/rcp /usr/bin/rsh error: No package owns /usr/bin/ftp error: No package owns /usr/bin/rcp error: No package owns /usr/bin/rsh dmc...@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/ftp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-04 19:19 /usr/bin/ftp -> sftp dmc...@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/rcp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:22 /usr/bin/rcp -> scp dmc...@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/rsh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:23 /usr/bin/rsh -> ssh Anyone know where these symlinks came from? No package owns them, and they've obviously been around a while. They didn't exist on my newer x86_64 system. -Dan
