On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> telnet on i686 was fail for me. The escape sequence didn't seem to work at >> all. > Sorry, I actually meant x86_64 here. This was the scene on i686: I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the symlinks. > > :: Retrieving packages from testing... > inetutils-1.6-1-i686 321.9K 212.4K/s 00:00:02 [---------------------] > 100% > checking package integrity... > (1/1) checking for file conflicts [---------------------] > 100% > error: could not prepare transaction > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > inetutils: /usr/bin/ftp exists in filesystem > inetutils: /usr/bin/rcp exists in filesystem > inetutils: /usr/bin/rsh exists in filesystem > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. > > dmc...@dublin ~ > $ pacman -Qo /usr/bin/ftp /usr/bin/rcp /usr/bin/rsh > error: No package owns /usr/bin/ftp > error: No package owns /usr/bin/rcp > error: No package owns /usr/bin/rsh > > dmc...@dublin ~ > $ ll /usr/bin/ftp > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-04 19:19 /usr/bin/ftp -> sftp > > dmc...@dublin ~ > $ ll /usr/bin/rcp > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:22 /usr/bin/rcp -> scp > > dmc...@dublin ~ > $ ll /usr/bin/rsh > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:23 /usr/bin/rsh -> ssh > > > Anyone know where these symlinks came from? No package owns them, and > they've obviously been around a while. They didn't exist on my newer > x86_64 system. >
