On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the
>>> upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the
>>> symlinks.
>>
>> Thanks for reporting it, you allow me to be slightly lazier! :)
>
> I already got an answer from the upstream dev along with a patch.
> Please test inetutils-1.6-2.
>
>>
>> I'm not too worried about the symlinks as they can clearly be blown
>> away. But if all of us had them, it would at least be worth a news
>> item.
>>
>> -Dan
>>

Bump. Any signoffs?  Does anyone else got these file conflicts?

Reply via email to