On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 15:25 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the > >>> upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the > >>> symlinks. > >> > >> Thanks for reporting it, you allow me to be slightly lazier! :) > > > > I already got an answer from the upstream dev along with a patch. > > Please test inetutils-1.6-2. > > > >> > >> I'm not too worried about the symlinks as they can clearly be blown > >> away. But if all of us had them, it would at least be worth a news > >> item. > >> > >> -Dan > >> > > Bump. Any signoffs? Does anyone else got these file conflicts? >
I tested for the conflicts on two boxes, but nothing else. So 1/3 signoff from me. Dale
