On 22/09/16 at 05:55pm, Kyle Terrien via arch-general wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:16:27 +1200
Jason Ryan via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
Arch has from the start been clear about its goals and intentions.
I'll quote from a section of the wiki that people seem much less
familiar with:

”Whereas many GNU/Linux distributions attempt to be more
user-friendly, Arch Linux has always been, and shall always remain
user-centric. The distribution is intended to fill the needs of those
contributing to it, rather than trying to appeal to as many users as
possible. It is targeted at the proficient GNU/Linux user, or anyone
with a do-it-yourself attitude who is willing to read the
documentation, and solve their own problems.”


Yes, several people have quoted "Arch philosophy" for me.  I am
familiar with it.  I read it 3 years ago when I first installed Arch.  I
am also familiar with the fact that there are slightly different
interpretations of it.

For me, the issue is about framing the goal.  If the goal is to
"alienate new users that are unwilling to read man pages", then people
will surely find a way to alienate them.  However, if your goal is to
give people a minimal amount of information and direct them to the man
pages where they can read more, then the wiki will be more inviting.

The difference is all in the framing.  I personally prefer to see the
latter because it is more optimistic and invites those interested to
help with the distro.

Then we are in agreement; the goal is to provide people with what they
need and to encourage them to explore in more depth, or for edge cases,
the official documentation.

Incidentally, that approach is documented in the talk page leading up to
and after the merge.



GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to