On 7/28/05, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just because something is important to *you* doesn't mean it's > intrinsically important. I mean, I can sit here and say "WMII is the > best WM - I say we remove all other WMs from current/extra and only > use WMII, because it's that important", but that doesn't make it true. > > Obviously this package can't be that important because: > a) I've honestly never heard of it and can't even bring myself to care > enough to click the link > b) No one has brought this up yet in all the history of Arch >
Which goes back to my original point. The AUR voting process is there to see what users want... if only a few people want it, well at least these few people can get it from AUR. > On 7/28/05, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well... I'm no advocate of the procedures involved with the AUR.... > > they actually are one of the reasons why I left Arch... the other one > > is that phrakture left me for some young 20y/o fluff with blue eyes > > and blond hair :( > > Oh honey, you're the only one for me! > Ya you said that before... -- Martin Lefebvre eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: https://sigterm.homeunix.com Registered Linux #349269 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT dpu s:-- a- C+++ UL++++ P-- L++++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K- w--- O- M-- V-- PS PE Y PGP-- t+++ 5- X R- tv++ b+ DI-- D+ G-- e h++ r++ y** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
